a form of bias that results in either intentionally or accidentally non-representative research in favor of a particular political ideology or motive.
Abramowitz, S. I., Gomes, B., & Abramowitz, C. V. (1975). Publish or Politic: Referee Bias in Manuscript Review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 187-200.
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global environmental change, 14(2), 125-136.
Brandenburg, H. (2005). Political bias in the Irish media: A quantitative study of campaign coverage during the 2002 general election. Irish Political Studies, 20(3), 297-322.
Ceci, S. J., Peters, D., & Plotkin, J. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40(9), 994.
Duarte, J.L, Crawford, J.T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P.E. (in press). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
See all commentaries on this target article here.
See authors’ response to commentaries here.
Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50(3), 145.
Eagly, A. H. (2013). The science and politics of comparing men and women: A reconsideration. In M. K. Ryan & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), Sage handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 11-28). London, England: Sage.
Gross, N. (2013). Why are professors liberal and why do conservatives care? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gross, N. (2015). Liberals and conservatives in academia: A reply to my critics. Society, 52, 47-53.
Gross, N., & Simmons, S. (2006). Americans’ views of political bias in the academy and academic freedom.
Hackett, R. A. (1984). Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 1(3), 229-259.
Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Anglin, S.M., & Stevens, S.T. (in press). Ideological bias in social psychological research. To appear in J. Forgas, K. Fiedler, & W. Crano (eds), Sydney Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics.
Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Stevens, S.T., & Anglin, S.M. (in press). The politics of social psychological science: Distortions in the social psychology of intergroup relations. To appear in P. Valdesolo and J. Graham (eds), Claremont Symposium on Social Psychology and Politics.
Jussim, L., Crawford, J.T., Stevens, S.T., Anglin, S.M., & Duarte, J.L. (in press). Can high moral purposes undermine scientific integrity? To appear in J. Forgas, P. van Lange, & L. Jussim (eds), The Sydney Symposium on the Social Psychology of Morality.
Maranto, R., Redding, R. E., & Hess, F. M. (Eds.). (2009). The Politically Correct University: Problems, Scope, and Reforms. Rowman & Littlefield.
Marsden, G.M. (2015). Religious discrimination in academia. Society, 52, 19-22.
Martin, C.C. (2015). How ideology has hindered sociological insight. The American Sociologist, doi: 10.1007/s12108-015-9263-z.
Posner, E. A. (2008). Does political bias in the judiciary matter?: Implications of judicial bias studies for legal and constitutional reform. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(2), 853-883.
Redding, R. E. (2001). Sociopolitical diversity in psychology: The case for pluralism. American Psychologist, 56(3), 205.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.
Tetlock, P. E. (1994). Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? Political Psychology, 509-529.
Tetlock, P.E., & Mitchell, G. (2015). Why so few conservatives and should we care? Society, 52, 28-34.
Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human relations, 59(10), 1343-1370.
Woessner, M., & Kelly-Woessner, A. (2015). Reflections on academic liberalism and conservative criticism. Society, 52, 35-41.
Yancey, G. (2015). Both/and instead of either/or. Society, 52, 23-27.
Zimmerman, J. (2015). The context of undergraduate teaching and learning. Society, 52, 42-46.
BPS invites readers to send (to email@example.com) relevant papers and links to add to this website.